Page 191 - SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES & COVID-19
P. 191

PT Krakatau steel to not able to compete (CNBC.Indonesia, 2019). The government permits for the establishment
                   of a steel company from China in Kendal district, Central Java, with an investment of US $ 2.54 billion, making PT
                   Krakatau Steel unable to compete. The corruption in the alleged bribery of the goods and equipment procurement
                   project of the Krakatau Steel Directorate of Technology and Production was valued at Rp24 billion and Rp2.4
                   billion, respectively .
               3)  PT Bulog suffered losses due to government policies regarding the BPNT (non-cash food aid) program. The poor
                   are given vouchers and they can buy directly from the market, not through Bulog anymore (Bisnis.Tempo, 2019).
                   As a result, Bulog’s procurement stocks, both imported and domestic, are stored in the warehouse for too long and
                   can rot.
               4)  PT Indofarma suffered losses due to significant receivables from third parties. Indofarma provides medicines to
                   hospitals in collaboration with BPJS, but the Government does not immediately pay BPJS debt to the hospital. This
                   has hampered the payment of hospital debt to Indofarma so that Indofarma’s receivables to the hospital have
                   increased (Katadata.co.id, 2019).
               5)  PT Berdikari suffered losses due to corruption-related to receiving gifts or promises related to fertilizer procurement.
                   Also, PT Berdikari’s subsidiary, Berdikari Insurance, failed to pay its insurance claims against a customer, PT Kaltim
                   Daya Mandiri (KDM), which is a subsidiary of PT Pupuk Kaltim. PT Berdikari had no administrative order, related
                   to the decision to release the majority share ownership in PT Berdikari Insurance to the new owner. Failure to pay
                   claim funds for PT KDM. The new owner Berdikari Insurance also defaulted not only to PT KDM but also to other
                   customers (Tirto.id, 2017).
               6)  PT PANN  (PT Pembangunan Armada Niaga Nasional) suffered losses due to factoring cases. President Director
                   of PT KII Eka Wahyu Kasih sold receivables to PT PANN on the invoice for PT Indonesia Power . The receivables
                   do not yet meet the requirements to be accounted for. This case caused state financial losses of Rp55 billion.
                   Corruption over financing, debt transfer, operation and provision of bailout funds by PT PANN (Persero) to PT
                   Meranti Maritime, which has the potential to harm the State worth the US $ 27 million or the equivalent of Rp1.3
                   trillion (Independensi.com, 2019).

               The factors causing the most losses are due to corruption in SOEs, then due to government policies, unprofessional
               management, entanglement in accounts payable, inadequate administration and cases of default to other parties, the
               price of services/products not being able to compete, and due to late decisions from the government

               2.3.  Hypothesis
               Based on the practical phenomenon that there are many large cases of state-owned enterprises that have resulted in
               losses, as well as widespread issues about the continued increase in state debt, among others, through state-owned
               enterprises, for example, the debt of Bank Mandiri, Bank BNI, and Bank BRI to the CDB (China Development Bank)
               amounting to Rp42 trillion (Detikfinance, 2019), the research hypothesis are:

               H1: SOEs’ financial performance has decreased from year to year.
               H2: SOEs financial performance differs significantly from non-SOEs
               H3: SOEs Sustainability Report is significantly different from non-SOEs

               3.  RESEARCH METHOD

               Research objects are all state-owned companies that go public and non-state-owned companies that have similar
               businesses with SOEs. The observation period was from 2013 to 2019. The research sample was taken purposively, for
               SOEs that went public, the criteria were: 1) SOEs that went public, 2) presented financial reports 3) Presenting annual
               reports. For non-SOEs companies, the criteria are as follows: 1) being a similar company with SOEs, 2) presenting
               financial reports, 3) presenting annual reports, 4) samples taken at least some similar SOEs.

               Data is taken from financial reports and annual reports available on IDX and the Web of each company. The method of
               analysis uses quantitative descriptive, namely analyzing and describing the available quantitative data. The method for
               comparing the performance and disclosure of SOEs “sustainability reports” uses the analysis of t-test differences and
               non-parametric differences test Man Whitney U.





        190     International Conference on Sustainability
                (5  Sustainability Practitioner Conference)
                 Th
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196