Page 164 - SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES & COVID-19
P. 164

Michael J and William M (1976) say there are at least three types of agency fees, including:
                  a.  Costs allocated to monitor managerial activities, for example audit fees.
                  b.  Costs are used to limit or control management activities from unwanted actions and abuse of authority. Examples
                     are the costs of making standard operating procedures, creating company information systems, and appointing
                     outside parties to become the board of directors or occupy the management hierarchy.
                  c.  Opportunity costs that occur because of restrictions on shareholder votes.

                  Agency cost expenditures must be managed so that they are not too excessive so that the costs incurred for supervision
                  do not exceed the benefits obtained or in other words the output received is not proportional to the costs incurred.
                  Jensen and Meckling (1976) classify agency costs into 3 types, namely:
                  a.  Monitoring costs. Costs incurred to control and supervise management activities.
                  b.  Bonding cost. Costs incurred by management to comply with and establish systems and procedures to provide
                     assurance that management is acting in the interests of the principal.
                  c.  Residual loss. Costs incurred due to a decrease in principal’s welfare as a result of differences in decisions between
                     management and principals. Therefore, the principal needs to supervise the company’s activities which are carried
                     out by management. In this case, the independent auditor is an independent party appointed to carry out an
                     examination of the financial statements prepared by management.

                  In reducing information asymmetry, one of the duties of public accountants is to conduct audits that aim to provide an
                  opinion regarding the fairness of the presentation of financial statements made by the company. Public accountants
                  in providing opinions must be independent and not in favor of anyone’s interests and providing audit opinion is
                  carried  out  with  due  regard  to  audit  quality. To  achieve  this,  public  accountants  have  professional  standards  that
                  regulate the quality of services provided by public accountants in Indonesia. One of these professional standards is the
                  Quality Control System which provides guidance to public accounting firms in implementing service quality control
                  carried out by their offices by complying with various standards that have been issued by the Professional Standards
                  Board for Public Accountants of the Indonesian Institute of Certified Public Accountants (DSPAP IAPI) and the Rules.
                  Ethics Compartment of Public Accountants published by IAPI. By applying applicable professional standards, Public
                  Accountants will provide quality services so that they can help companies provide information to companies as an
                  added value for company evaluation and improvement.

                  2.2  Good Corporate Governance
                  The OECD (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development) defines Good Corporate Governance or what is
                  called good corporate governance as a set of regulations that regulate the relationship between company management,
                  shareholders, boards, and other parties who have interests in the company. Good corporate governance is governance
                  that  provides  supervisory  facilities  in  achieving  the  goals  of  company  management,  boards  and  shareholders.
                  Supervision is aimed at providing adequate assurance that the company has managed company resources efficiently
                  and minimizing deviant behavior in earnings management.


                  In its application, to implement GCG in a company, principles are needed so that GCG can be implemented properly.
                  According to the KNKG (National Committee for Governance Policy) (Zarkasyi, 2008), the principles of GCG are:
                      a.   Transparency
                         To maintain objectivity in conducting business, companies must provide material and relevant information in
                         a way that is easily accessible and understood by stakeholders. Companies must take the initiative to disclose
                         not only the problems implied by laws and regulations, but also matters that are important for decision
                         making  by  shareholders,  creditors  and  other  stakeholders.  Here  there  are  2  indicators  used  in  assessing
                         company transparency, namely information and policies within the company.
                      b.  Accountability
                         The company must be accountable for its performance in a transparent and fair manner. For this reason, the
                         company must be managed properly, measured and in accordance with the interests of the company by
                         taking into account the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. Accountability is a requirement
                         needed to achieve sustainable performance. In assessing the accountability of a company, it can be seen
                         from 2 indicators, namely work basis and audit.





                                                                                 International Conference on Sustainability  163
                                                                                 (5  Sustainability Practitioner Conference)
                                                                                  Th
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169