Page 118 - SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES & COVID-19
P. 118

Prior research found that SMG’s application helps an organization handle various evaluators with conflicting interests
                  and mitigate the risk from the disappointment of evaluators that might lead to an organizational de-legitimacy (Etter
                  et al., 2019). With the benefit of encouraging members’ participation and transparency (Dreyer & Ziebarth, 2014), a
                  better social media practice draws favorable judgment in public discourse (Schultz, Castelló, & Morsing, 2013) and then
                  improve organizational reputation and legitimacy (Carroll & McCombs, 2003). Thus, a better implementation of SMG is
                  expected to improve organizational legitimacy by encouraging positive sentiment on social media.

                  H : Organizations with a higher social media governance score have better legitimacy than those with a lower
                   1
                     score.

                  2.3  Institutional Theory
                  According  to  Meyer  and  Rowan  (1977),  the  social  context  where  firms  operate  influences  organizations’  behavior.
                  Therefore, it leads organizations to adopt a similar practice and become isomorphic with each other, for example,
                  when organizations are exposed by similar regulations, threats, and social pressure (Bretschneider & Parker, 2016).  In
                  contrast, the organization that is in the opposite type will be expected to behave differently. Similarly, organizations
                  that  adopt  different  cultures  might  act  differently.  For  example,  small  businesses  that  usually  adopt  clan  culture
                  (Zammuto & Krakower, 1991) are expected to have a different perception of public disclosure than listed companies.
                  In this research, the inclusion of organizations’ internal characteristics, such as organizational types and cultures, as
                  moderating variables, are based on this theory.

                  2.4  Organizational Cultures
                  Organizational culture is a set of shared values and norms that influence members’ behavior and interactions toward
                  each other and their environment (Dyck et al., 2019). Schein (2010) suggests that organizational culture is a social force
                  that is mostly invisible, yet very powerful to push an organization towards specific goals or in a particular direction.
                  Organizational culture is an internal factor within an organization that playing phenomena for understanding the
                  effect of governance on organization performance where differences in organizational culture will result in different
                  effectivities (Baird, Su, & Tung, 2018).


                  Dyck et al. (2019) differentiate the culture using the Competing Value Framework by Cameron and Quinn (2011). This
                  framework derived and validated the most critical element that shaped how people think, organize their values and
                  ideology, and process information (Linnenluecke & Griffiths, 2010). It has four areas separated by the x and y-axis. Y-axis
                  represents the member’s value; the X-axis represents the member’s prioritization. However, Jones, Jimmieson, and
                  Griffiths (2005) state that an organization cannot be classified in only one culture because it is not mutually exclusive.
                  It might be classified in more than one category (R. Quinn, 1985).


                                                            Change
                                                    (Flexibility and Adaptiveness)


                                                       Clan     Adhocracy
                                                      Culture    Culture

                                          Internal                          External
                                                      Hierarchy  Market
                                                      Culture    Culture


                                                           Stability
                                                     (Predictability and Control)

                                                           Figure 1
                                                   Competing Value Network
                                                    Source: Cameron and Quinn (2011)





                                                                                 International Conference on Sustainability  117
                                                                                 (5  Sustainability Practitioner Conference)
                                                                                  Th
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123