Page 92 - SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES & COVID-19
P. 92

REFERENCES

                  Book
                  Parry, M., et al. (2007) The Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
                  Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 976.


                  Journal Article
                  •   Bigerna, S. and Polinori, P. (2011) Italian consumers’ willingness to pay for renewable energy sources, Munich
                     Personal RePEc Archive, No. 34408.
                  •   Dogan, E. and Muhaamad, I. (2019) Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in
                     Turkey, The Electricity Journal 32 (2019) 10667.
                  •   Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. J Econ Perspect;8: 19–43.
                  •   Homburg, C., Koschate, N., Hoyer, W.D. (2005): Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship
                     Between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, pp. 84–96.
                  •   Moriarty, P., and Honnery, D., (2009). What energy levels can the earth sustain? Energy Policy 37 (7), 2469–2474.
                  •   Oerlemans,  L.A.,  Chan,  K.Y.  and Volschenk,  J.,  (2016). Willingness  to  pay  for  green  electricity:  A  review  of  the
                     contingent valuation literature and its sources of error. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, pp.875-
                     885.
                  •   Xie, Bai-Chen, Wei Zhao (2018). Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent
                     valuation method. Journal of Energy Policy, Vol. 114, pp. 98-107.

























































                                                                                 International Conference on Sustainability  91
                                                                                 (5  Sustainability Practitioner Conference)
                                                                                  Th
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97